This is the best way to learn chemistry, hands down

"TheHondaBro" (wwaveform) 05/17/2016 at 12:25 • Filed to: sarcasm, fucking pearson

0

8

Oh Pearson, you so smart.

RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > TheHondaBro 05/17/2016 at 12:31

2

Clarity in instruction is for weirdies.

Xyl0c41n3 > RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht 05/17/2016 at 12:39

1

Sounds like Common Core shit:

“The answer 645 is reasonable.” What the hell is that shit? The answer isn’t “reasonable,” it’s correct. End of story.

Then there’s this clusterfuck used to teach simple subtraction to second graders:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/28/vir…

RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > Xyl0c41n3 05/17/2016 at 12:42

1

If everybody is equally confused and deliberately mindfucked, nobody will excel over the rest! Teaching people shortcuts and tricks before drilling the basics will in no way backfire and in no way resembles whole word reading instruction because shut up is why.

xyzabc > Xyl0c41n3 05/17/2016 at 12:48

0

There are Three (3) types of people in the world.

Those that can count and those that can’t.

Xyl0c41n3 > xyzabc 05/17/2016 at 12:50

0

Who*

TheHondaBro > xyzabc 05/17/2016 at 12:54

0

And those who weren’t expecting a ternary joke.

scoob > Xyl0c41n3 05/17/2016 at 13:06

2

Why the hell does 291 round down to 200?

Xyl0c41n3 > scoob 05/17/2016 at 13:10

0

Right?! When I was in school, we learned that anything over 5 rounded up. Like, 7 rounds to 10, 18 rounds to 20, 36 rounds to 40, etc. At just nine short of 300, there’s no way in common sense that 291 should round down to 200. It’s ridiculous. A better “estimated sum” would be 650. That's a helluva lot closer to 645 than 500 is.